John Sciacca Writes...

Features, Reviews and a Blog by John Sciacca
Random Thoughts (Blog)
Random Thoughts (Blog)
Random Thoughts (Blog)
Loyalty: That and a buck gets you some gum
Posted on September 7, 2010 at 1:34 PM |
Loyalty is almost totally lost in society today. I mean, you expect Russell from Survivor to tell you “Look! It’s me and you till the end! I swear on my children!” and then immediately cut your throat at the next Tribal. All the while grinning that missing-tooth smirk. But apparently that’s kind of back=stabbery is not just limited to Samoa any longer.
A sports star used to be identified with a team. Joe Montana WAS a 49er. Michael Jordan WAS a Bull. Babe Ruth WAS a Yankee. They would start their career with a team, and they would end it there. Now a player’s loyalty is only as good as the wetness of the ink on their contract which they use to bully other teams into adding another zero the next time negotiations come around. One jersey, city or team is as good as any other. You’re almost more likely to win the lottery or get hit by a falling chunk of Russian satellite debris than to have a marriage that doesn’t end in divorce. Even Mafia killers are turning squealer to try and shave some time off their sentences. (Or maybe they’re just currying favor with Amanda Knox, who, let’s be honest, has to be near the top of the list of hottest convicted murderers ever.)
The relationship between dealer and manufacturer is surely no better. Most manufacturers today base the quality of their relationships solely on the amount of your last PO. (I say “most” because there are some company’s out there that do still seem to value the benefits of a long-term, committed, monogamous relationship. I’m looking at you, Definitive Technology. Come on over here, big fella, and let’s have a hug!) Recently our company was suddenly and unceremoniously dropped by they who shall not be named. Other manufacturers say they want to support the custom side of the industry, but then turn a blind eye (and offer tons a back door incentives) to Big Box stores that can sell far more units. So what if they do so at pricing that is at or – in many cases – BELOW our wholesale pricing? At the end of the day, they are consuming mass quantities and that seems to be the only game in town that matters any more. Ultimately, why should they care what the retailer sells if for as long as they are getting their cut. (Of course, they SHOULD care because if the specialty dealers that provide all the top-shelf education and white-glove support go away, they’ll be forced to sell to the bottom in a market where ONLY price matters.)
In the custom installation business, loyalty is one of the things that we have always counted on. Our life’s blood is customer referrals and – to a degree – repeat business. As I write this, I am sitting next to four filing cabinets that are each 52-inches tall and 24-inches deep. That is a LOT of history of completed jobs. (Well, I guess it could be just a bunch of empty file cabinet space, but you’ll have to take my word for it, that they are indeed PACKED with actual files. Even W-Z at the very end is pretty crammed.) And while I won’t say that EVERY customer in those files loves us, I will say that the vast majority do. (Usually the ones that don’t are the ones that also don’t want to pay. I’m looking at you Bill Martin; you frickin’ crook, who punked us for over $10,000 and said you wouldn’t pay because your lights didn’t work. That’s right, they DON’T work, jack wagon! Because you cheaped out and didn’t install the Lutron Homeworks system we committed to, so now every switch in your house is located in random closets! Your bitching out and not buying the lighting that we thoroughly went over and designed is NOT my problem. And then when the bank took your house you cut out and removed all of the gear. And now we have a judgment against you that is probably worth literally less than the paper it is printed on. I mean, it is a nice heavy-stock of paper and the judge did sign it and all.)
But that loyalty too is flagging. In the past, when a previous client would build a new home, it would be a lock that we would do the next one. And then the one after that. But recently we’ve had a few clients that have decided to go with others based solely on price. And they’ve gone with outfits that are 2 hours away in one case and close to 4 in another. When we mentioned that those companies MIGHT not be able to service them in the future to the degree to which they’ve become accustomed – you know, accustomed from the type of service that WE have been providing for years – they shrug it off with a, “Well, I’ll cross that bridge when I get to it.” (Somewhere, I hope there is an F-117 at this very second laser targeting that bridge with a Paveway outfitted with cluster munitions.)
What prompted all of this was a phone call last week from another client that we’ve done two projects with. He needed a new TV because the Pioneer Elite Plasma we sold him years ago had finally gone to seek its Great Reward. So he calls and says, “I’m interested in a Panasonic 3D model blah-blah-blah. I’d like you guys to install it for me and connect it to my system. And I’d be willing to buy the TV from you if you can match this price.” Oh, boy! You’d be WILLING to buy it from us? Wow! That’s so frickin’ thoughtful! Really, you shouldn’t have! Because he has boiled everything our company offers – knowledge, support, service, integration – down to merely matching a number.
And actually, that's not entirely how the conversation went. Before he got to the part about matching pricing, he wanted to discuss several different models and get my professional take on them. Which was the better technology, which did I prefer, which did I recommend. You know, all those things that you would expect to get when calling someone you've been doing business with for a whiile.
But like so many others these days, he wants the Girlfriend Experience, but wants to pay the scary-girl-under-the-bridge-in-dire-need-of-dental-work price. He wants the treatment and warm-fuzzy he gets from shopping at Tiffany’s, Rolls-Royce, Virgin Atlantic First Class (insert favorite costs-a lot-but-offers-spectacular-service name here), but to pay the lowest price he can find at Crazy Salaam’s Internet Bazaar.
So, would it be wrong to have clients initial a box that says, “I understand that you have sold me this item at a ridiculously low price. For this price, I can’t possibly expect you to provide the level of service that you have normally offered in the past. Instead, I agree to expect the level of service that I would normally receive from an Internet retailer. Namely, none. If anything happens to my purchase once it has entered my home, I promise not to call you or ask for any help whatsoever. If I do call you, I’ll fully expect to wade through lengthy phone-mail trees and then leave messages that I know won’t be returned, or possibly be greeted by a surly operator that will say they are transferring me but will actually be hanging up on me.”
Because, loyalty is a two-way street. And if you want me to be here and be loyal to you by providing on going service and support then I am gonna expect some semblance of that in return. And if we’re going to just boil our relationship down to the lowest price, then lets just clear all the other fringe fineries and niceties out of the way.
Categories: September 2010, CTA, Rants
Post a Comment
Oops!
The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.
0 Comments
Categories
- Rants (122)
- Reviews (111)
- 3D TV (33)
- Movies (125)
- Music (45)
- TV (71)
- Electronics (208)
- Books (33)
- CTA (207)
- Family (71)
- Coffee (11)
- Top 10 List (16)
- Computers (33)
- Bizarre (36)
- Guest Blog (27)
- On Writing (30)
- CES/CEDIA (58)
- Beer/Liquor/Wine (87)
- Best Of... (13)
- Feb 2010 (4)
- Mar 2010 (39)
- April 2010 (30)
- May 2010 (36)
- June 2010 (32)
- July 2010 (31)
- August 2010 (38)
- September 2010 (35)
- October 2010 (31)
- November 2010 (34)
- December 2010 (22)
- January 2011 (24)
- February 2011 (26)
- March 2011 (25)
- April 2011 (22)
- May 2011 (22)
- June 2011 (21)
- July 2011 (23)
- August 2011 (19)
- September 2011 (22)
- October 2011 (13)
- November 2011 (12)
- December 2011 (11)
- January 2012 (12)
- February 2012 (15)
- March 2012 (17)
- April 2012 (27)
- May 2012 (12)
- June 2012 (12)
- July 2012 (12)
- August 2012 (14)
- September 2012 (12)
- October 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (10)
- December 2012 (14)
- January 2013 (14)
- February 2013 (14)
- March 2013 (18)
- April 2013 (20)
- May 2013 (15)
- June 2013 (9)
- July 2013 (10)
- August 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (7)
- October 2013 (12)
- November 2013 (9)
- December 2013 (5)
- January 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (4)
- March 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (5)
- May 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (5)
- August 2014 (2)
- September 2014 (3)
Oops!
Oops, you forgot something.